On 5/25/21 5:04 PM, Peter Boy wrote:
So the same model works totally fine for both desktop and server.I myself lack the exact technical knowledge, but (all?) server and file system experts I hear consider just that a gross misconception.
I think you and Neal talk about two different things. The BTRFS proponents claim that the subvolume technology allows you to have flexible partitioning, so that you can dynamically create whatever partition layout is appropriate for your situation. Nobody is claiming that desktop partition scheme ('model') should be forced onto servers.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
