On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 09:43:34AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > > On 4/26/2021 8:20 AM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Kevin, I'd love to support your stance and use GCC. However, there are > > > reasons why we will need to consider Clang for e.g. Ruby: > > > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1721553 > > > > > > And the reason is not even that upstream favors Clang. The situation is > > > unfortunately not just black and white. > > Looks like the best solution there is to disable PCH support in the Ruby > > JIT. > > FWIW Vit, myself and others have already extensively discussed this > situation. Clang is really the best solution in the case of the Ruby JIT > given the various constraints in play. Isn't that MIR instead? Jakub _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
