On 4/26/2021 9:52 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 09:43:34AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
On 4/26/2021 8:20 AM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
Vít Ondruch wrote:
Kevin, I'd love to support your stance and use GCC. However, there are
reasons why we will need to consider Clang for e.g. Ruby:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1721553
And the reason is not even that upstream favors Clang. The situation is
unfortunately not just black and white.
Looks like the best solution there is to disable PCH support in the Ruby
JIT.
FWIW Vit, myself and others have already extensively discussed this
situation. Clang is really the best solution in the case of the Ruby JIT
given the various constraints in play.
Isn't that MIR instead?
Hopefully one day. But right now Clang is the best choice for Ruby.
jeff
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
