On 4/23/21 4:55 PM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CompilerPolicy
Is the change owners' plan here to resubmit this same rejected change for
every single release until people get so fed up that they end up approving
it just to get it out of the way?
This change was never rejected. It become stalled waiting for the change
owners to address some feedback from FESCo. The feedback has been addressed now,
which is why it was resubmitted.
You can review the discussion here: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2409
-Tom
Sorry, but resubmitting a rejected change when nothing in the context
situation has really changed since is not a productive thing to do.
What will FESCo's workload look like if the owners of every rejected change
start doing this? Do you want me to resubmit "KDE Plasma Desktop by Default"
for every single release?
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
