On 4/24/2021 8:26 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Fri, Apr 23 2021 at 08:01:03 PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek
<jakub@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'll be probably repeating myself, but the two compilers are known to be
ABI incompatible in very important ways, none of the
https://bugs.llvm.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=42439%2C19909%2C44228%2C12207
bugs have been touched since last time this was discussed and I'm not
aware
of any ABI compatibility testing between the two compilers.
So if some library packages switch compilers and programs using those
libraries don't or vice versa, this proposal has quite high risks of
introducing hard to debug debugs.
Perhaps this proposal should be revisited in the future when there are
fewer scary ABI bugs.
That's not really a scary ABI bug. There's disagreement about a fairly
unusual case involving extension of 8 bit arguments and some issues with
128 bit types. I wouldn't consider either a show stopper for this proposal.
jeff
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure