Re: Grub 2 protected packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 2:29 PM PGNet Dev <pgnet.dev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Ordinarily, no. But in this case, since GRUB 2.06~rc1 is required to
> > solve major critical vulnerabilities and it's very difficult to pull
> > the patch set that fixes it (>115 patches!) backwards, GRUB got moved
> > forward instead.
> >
> > GRUB 2.06~rc1 was pretty much released to release the patch set...
>
> got it.
>

As Neal said, the other option was to backport all the CVE fixes and
SBAT support patches which was a riskier option.

Also, we are trying to get rid of the huge patch-set that the Fedora
package is currently carrying, not adding more to the set.

> then will stick with v2.06, and try to get it re-patched for Xen @ the bug.
>

I dropped it by mistake when rebasing to 2.06, sorry about that. I've
fixed it now in F33, F34 and Rawhide.

Best regards,
Javier
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux