Re: systemd-resolved fallback DNS servers: usability vs. GDPR

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 25.02.21 um 10:51 schrieb Florian Weimer:

Why do you think that?

Caching DNS server availability is a commonly requested feature even in
data center deployments.  The way Fedora currently implements its DNS
client, it more or less defeats the built-in high availability mechanism
of DNS, and complex network-based mitigations are needed (like using
anycast DNS resolvers).

If you run a server farm with mailservers, you usually have antispam services like spamhaus enabled.

If one server from an ip adressrange is using spamhaus, spamhaus is fine with it. If a hundret ips from that ip addressrange ask spamhaus, you get blocked quite fast.

The cache on the server itself, is of limit use here. Thats why you use a central dns cache on one server,
so anyone benefits from the caching and spamhaus is happy : win-win.

On a desktop / laptop you won't have such a scenario in the first place, here local caching makes more sense.

best regards,
Marius Schwarz
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux