Re: systemd-resolved fallback DNS servers: usability vs. GDPR

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



FWIW I agree that systemd-resolved is *much* less important for servers and containers than it is on desktops.

That said, the benefit of having a DNS cache is very real, as is the benefit of a unified, standardized API for controlling your DNS configuration that's the same regardless of which type of system you are running.

On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 3:18 pm, Paul Wouters <paul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm confused here too, since AFAIK NM does not support tying queries for
certain domains to certain nameservers,

No, it does. If it didn't, we would not have working split DNS, since NetworkManager must propagate its configuration down to systemd-resolved.

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux