On 1/28/21 9:34 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 1/27/21 8:30 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
SO, I don't really understand... Patrick says in the Change:
"The size of the rpmdb increases from 22952 to 28416 bytes, a 20%
increase. This is on an install size of 1.7GB in total, so this 5MB
increase is a 0.3% size increase on the final installed system."
Is that just because he used the server install with fewer files?
As directories are not signed, in a smaller installation the directory vs file ratio could be different, making the overhead smaller than in a larger install. Looking at the F33 server edition install, there are
59246 files total, 22837 of which are directories. That's a very different ratio to my laptop install where there are 402158 files total of which 70874 are directories.
So it's a case of "it depends" and it depends quite a lot. By no means the overhead is always 45% but neither is it always 20% - depending on the exact package set it can be even be quite a bit more or less than either figure.
My data point: I have 1864399 files in rpm DB (rpm -qla|wc -l).
The rpm database is 770MB (du /var/lib/rpm).
An additional 162 bytes per file would raise it by 302MB (+39%).
Looks expensive to me, especially when considering that I get no feature for this overhead.
Regards.
--
Roberto Ragusa mail at robertoragusa.it
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
