On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 10:48:46AM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: > On 1/26/21 8:44 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > So, the thread here kind of fell quiet with everything else going on. > > > > It seems clear there's issues to address here before this change might > > get approved. Here's my list: > > > > * Try and change the storage format of the signatures to not take up > > tons of room. I guess this would be in ima tools and sigul? > > > > That'd be rpm upstream work. > > On my F33 laptop, there are 331284 rpm-installed files. The IMA signature as > proposed is apparently 162 bytes per file in the hex-encoded format, this > makes for approximately 51 megabytes of data. My rpmdb is about 115 > megabytes. That'd be almost 45% increase in size! SO, I don't really understand... Patrick says in the Change: "The size of the rpmdb increases from 22952 to 28416 bytes, a 20% increase. This is on an install size of 1.7GB in total, so this 5MB increase is a 0.3% size increase on the final installed system." Is that just because he used the server install with fewer files? Or is your or his math wrong here? kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
