Re: Fedora 34 Change: Signed RPM Contents (late System-Wide Change)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



So, the thread here kind of fell quiet with everything else going on. 

It seems clear there's issues to address here before this change might
get approved. Here's my list: 

* Try and change the storage format of the signatures to not take up
tons of room. I guess this would be in ima tools and sigul?

* Get rpm updated at least in all Fedora's / active RHEL's to be able to
handle rpms with the signatures. I don't know how likely this is for
rhel7, but 8 and fedora 32 should hopefully not be hard.

* Have a few actual, working policies people can look at and see what
they can do/how this is useful

Any other important ones to add? 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux