Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk wrote: > I'd like to point out that after many requests, I have updated the change > page for this significantly, with more details as to the goals (and > non-goals) of this feature, and answers to many other questions asked. Sorry, but these clarifications only make it even clearer to me that I do not want this. The size measurements show that the RPMDB increases by 20%, which is a lot. Also, the unit "bytes" in that sentence seems to be wrong, because the next sentence speaks of a 5 MB increase. And this "feature": | Having all files signed with Fedora keys would enable integration with for | example [https://keylime.dev/], which is a CNCF project that implements | remote system attestation, based on which a system may or may not get | access to secrets and other consequences. claims that those signatures can be used by a remote system to enforce an unmodified Fedora, which is a blatant violation of GPLv3 requirements. Kevin Kofler _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
