On 10. 01. 21 23:25, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 02:20:04PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
All this does is making it again harder to issue bug fixes for the very
packages where it matters the most.
But...if the tests pass it doesn't, and I already said that the tests
pretty much always pass and I actively work to resolve any case where a
test fails when it shouldn't.
You're not going to be waiving results for every update, here. It would
be a pretty rare occurrence.
And, also hopefully also a rare occasion, but if this were enabled (and the
definitions up to date), problems like
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/thread/CAS6KHTZLR6LUNWEVK3BOIO6HVNQDETZ/#N5HJDKMTGOTL44BT2HZ43LE6Q23345IQ
would be caught before they hit users.
I believe we should gate on installability first.
See https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2343
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
