On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 9:09 PM Kevin Kofler via devel <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Adam Williamson wrote: > > So here's an idea I was thinking about over the RH shutdown: I propose > > we gate stable release critical path updates on the openQA tests. > > -1 > > We already enforce too strict requirements on updates, *especially* those > that deliberately or accidentally end up in the "critical path", instead of > trusting the maintainer to do the right thing. This only makes it worse. > > Pushing to stable should be a concious decision made by a person, the > maintainer, not by automated rules of any kind. I think you've got this backwards, Kevin. This is about disabling the autopush if any of those tests fail. So the result would be that critical path packages would get 1) more testing before the existing autopush occurs and 2) if any of those tests fail, it won't get pushed stable unless a conscious decision is made by the maintainer. So if anything, I think this change is in line with your views here. (Also, let's please not re-litigate the autopush concept in this thread.) _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
