On Fri, 2021-01-08 at 03:08 +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: > > So here's an idea I was thinking about over the RH shutdown: I propose > > we gate stable release critical path updates on the openQA tests. > > -1 > > We already enforce too strict requirements on updates, *especially* those > that deliberately or accidentally end up in the "critical path", instead of > trusting the maintainer to do the right thing. This only makes it worse. > > Pushing to stable should be a concious decision made by a person, the > maintainer, not by automated rules of any kind. It already often isn't, because people use the autopush mechanisms. Which are the default. I know you don't agree with that either, but they're already there and are used on almost all updates. There have been multiple occasions where an update that had a bug which openQA caught got autopushed stable because they got sufficient positive karma before I could notice the failure and -1 the update to disable autopush. That's the specific case I'm trying to address with this. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha https://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
