On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 11:16 AM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 21. 12. 20 19:36, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 09:21:15PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > >> As Miro mentioned, I've also developed scripts to handle this "does > >> this update break anything" for the Stewardship / Java SIG, because - > >> at least at first - we didn't have big enough egos / enough confidence > >> to just push updates to rawhide without testing excessively them > >> first: > >> https://github.com/fedora-stewardship/fedora-stewardship.github.io/blob/master/scripts/review_pr.py > >> > >> This first builds (one or more) packages from src.fpo dist-git forks > >> that were prepared for PRs in COPR, recursively or non-recursively > >> queries dependent packages for all of them, and rebuilds them in COPR. > >> Assuming that there's a copr-cli command for querying build successes, > >> they could be compared with the latest status of those packages in > >> koschei, and have it print new build failures. Right now, I compare > >> the results manually. > >> > >> Would something like this fit your definition of "does-it-blend" script? > > > > What format is '--from-git' in? Say I have a fork with a branch I want > > to test, what do I pass it? > > --from-git is a regex of package names that are built from dist git instead of > from latest known SRPM. > > AFAIK The script only supports "the one package" (that is being tested) to be > built from a custom branch, whoch is the purpose of the script: > > $ python scripts/review_pr.py foobar-2.0 kevin:foobar:branch-2.0 > > But you can later built another package in there (with or without depndents) in > the same copr: > > $ python scripts/review_pr.py foobar-2.0 kevin:bazbaz:fix_deps [-nx'.*'] > > > This is indeed the sort of thing I was thinking of (I think). You should actually be able to build an arbitrary number of packages before any of their dependencies are rebuilt - just add more FORKUSERNAME:PKGNAME:BRANCHNAME values. The CLI script explicitly accepts at-least-one-or-maybe-more (nargs="+") such values. Side note: I actually did not want to let users specify a PR URL, since you actually want to test your changes before submitting a PR, so you can specify the username/package/branch directly without having to create a PR first. But I think I could add that as an option to the CLI. Fabio _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx