Hi, On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 11:13:19AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I don't think you can make branches completely descripive by themselves, > unless possibly you make them really long. > > flatpak_branch_where_stable_flatpaks_are_made_from That it is about flatpaks is already described in the namespace, that it is a branch is clear from git. This only leaves "stable" as the one information in the long name that would be missing. > rawhide_its_the_branch_for_the_development_version_of_fedora_called_rawhide It is fair to assume that someone who needs to use this already knows what rawhide is. Otherwise they did not have any use for the branch, even if it is called "main", so this long explanation does not make sense, there. > I suppose it's ok to make 'rawhide' a symref to main, or 'stable' in the > flatpak case... "main" as a symref might help people that are used to using main. Assuming that the symrefs are not visible, it makes more sense to use the descriptive names for the branches such as rawhide/stable. Then they Thanks Till _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
