Re: Fedora 34 Change: GitRepos-master-to-main (Self-Contained Change)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 06:11:40AM -0500, Pavel Valena wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Till Maas" <opensource@xxxxxxxxx>
> > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Friday, December 4, 2020 11:09:27 AM
> > Subject: Re: Fedora 34 Change: GitRepos-master-to-main (Self-Contained Change)
> > 
> > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 08:52:13PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > 
> > > After looking at the infra and releng issue trackers Kevin managed to found
> > > back
> > > the ticket I was thinking about.
> > > You have my apologies, the namespace that was asking to a different default
> > > branch and for that branch to not be named "rawhide" was flatpaks.
> > > They wanted the default branch to be "stable", which would not apply to
> > > most
> > > other namespaces. Thus the proposal to go with "main" which works for all
> > > namespaces and seems to be on its way to become the industry standard.
> > 
> > The flatpak namespace considering "main" to be the stable branch but
> > rpms considering "main" to be the development branch, is IMHO an
> > argument why we flatpack should use "stable" and rpms "rawhide". This
> > will make it more clear for everyone what the branch is actually about.
> 
> I agree. "main" is still quite ambiguous - is it stable? is it devel?

It's the main branch where things take place. ;) 

> And "rawhide" would correspond with the repo... Is there any show-stopper that I've missed?

I don't think you can make branches completely descripive by themselves,
unless possibly you make them really long. 

flatpak_branch_where_stable_flatpaks_are_made_from

rawhide_its_the_branch_for_the_development_version_of_fedora_called_rawhide

So, IMHO, we are overcomplicating it, and we should just use main. 

I suppose it's ok to make 'rawhide' a symref to main, or 'stable' in the
flatpak case... 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux