On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 08:52:13PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > After looking at the infra and releng issue trackers Kevin managed to found back > the ticket I was thinking about. > You have my apologies, the namespace that was asking to a different default > branch and for that branch to not be named "rawhide" was flatpaks. > They wanted the default branch to be "stable", which would not apply to most > other namespaces. Thus the proposal to go with "main" which works for all > namespaces and seems to be on its way to become the industry standard. The flatpak namespace considering "main" to be the stable branch but rpms considering "main" to be the development branch, is IMHO an argument why we flatpack should use "stable" and rpms "rawhide". This will make it more clear for everyone what the branch is actually about. Using a ref to introduce "main" for muscle memory also sounds like a good idea. Thanks Till _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
