On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 10:01:04AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 01:50:24PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:08:26PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > Is there a reason why "main" is proposed instead of "rawhide" on src.fp.o? > > > For all non-dist-git repositories I am fine with "main", but if we are > > > changing this anyway, "rawhide" would actually make more sense for > > > dist-git repos. > > > This would make the branch name actually match the "releasever". > > > > I'm definitely in favor of this. I still have dreams of having Fedora and > > CentOS Stream branches sharing space in the repository, and having > > everything explicity named with what branch it is rather than fighting over > > who owns "main" would be nice. > > Perhaps this is heresy, but we could stop calling our main development > stream "rawhide", and instead call it "main", then it will be trivially > aligned with the "main" git branch name :-) > > I've never felt "rawhide" was a particularly good name. Unless you're > already familiar with Fedora, it is something whose meaning in the context > of Fedora has to be explained each time. The common meaning of the word > rawhide doesn't have especially positive associations either IMHO. Yeah, I am not a super fan of the name rawhide (Although I am a super fan of the thing we make called rawhide). :) I always thought it could be something better like 'headwaters' or something. But that gets us into a big long bikeshed. :( kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
