On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 01:50:24PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:08:26PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Is there a reason why "main" is proposed instead of "rawhide" on src.fp.o? > > For all non-dist-git repositories I am fine with "main", but if we are > > changing this anyway, "rawhide" would actually make more sense for > > dist-git repos. > > This would make the branch name actually match the "releasever". > > I'm definitely in favor of this. I still have dreams of having Fedora and > CentOS Stream branches sharing space in the repository, and having > everything explicity named with what branch it is rather than fighting over > who owns "main" would be nice. Perhaps this is heresy, but we could stop calling our main development stream "rawhide", and instead call it "main", then it will be trivially aligned with the "main" git branch name :-) I've never felt "rawhide" was a particularly good name. Unless you're already familiar with Fedora, it is something whose meaning in the context of Fedora has to be explained each time. The common meaning of the word rawhide doesn't have especially positive associations either IMHO. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
