On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 04:08:26PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > Is there a reason why "main" is proposed instead of "rawhide" on src.fp.o? > For all non-dist-git repositories I am fine with "main", but if we are > changing this anyway, "rawhide" would actually make more sense for > dist-git repos. > This would make the branch name actually match the "releasever". I'm definitely in favor of this. I still have dreams of having Fedora and CentOS Stream branches sharing space in the repository, and having everything explicity named with what branch it is rather than fighting over who owns "main" would be nice. As an alternate proposal, what is currently "master" could be moved to "rawhide" and a _new_ "main" branch created explicity to hold just a readme about that package's packaging details (like which branches are what when there are module branches or other things, whether there are particular things to be aware of that makes this package special, etc.). I'm not in love with this as a git pattern, but it's A Thing People Do Sometimes and maybe it's appropriate here. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
