Re: Should the default editor be changed from vi to nano on upgrades to Fedora 33+

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 03.12.20 um 21:06 schrieb Ben Cotton:
...changes in default behavior, when 1. technically reasonable and 2.
not explicitly overridden by the user, should generally be made on
upgrade. Distributions are supposed to be opinionated, and in cases
where the user has accepted our opinion, we should do our best to
provide it whether the system in question is an upgrade or a fresh
install.
Has anyone made any test on installed system, how man of them got changed by theire users to reflect a trend on changes in the user favor for vi or nano?

Or simpler: on which numbers has this decission been made? It is a "oh, i like nano and hate vim, so i suggest to change it" case or the "we asked 10.000 users  which editor they favor?" one?

One of those is a good base for a change proprosal, the other one not.

I, i.E., favor vi, as it has advantages.

Best regards,
Marius Schwarz
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux