Hello,
we have changed the default editor from vi to nano on Fedora 33+.
The change proposal says:
> Will not apply to upgrades.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UseNanoByDefault#Upgrade.2Fcompatibility_impact
However, currently, it does apply to upgrades:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896707
Should we try to "fix" this by ensuring the default does not change on upgrades?
Or should we acknowledge that it does?
(It's currently seems easier to acknowledge it than to ensure it doesn't change,
but let's try to discuss this without using that as an argument.)
Changing the default on upgrades is good because the Fedora 33+ experience is
similar regardless whether the system is freshly installed or upgraded.
Not changing the default on upgrades is good because users might be surprised by
the change.
I lean towards the "change the default on upgrades as well" option.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
