On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 19:48 +0100, Clement Verna wrote: [big snip] > To the outside > > world, there is a strong impression that the thing called "Fedora" is a > > product or set of products with a release number that gets released > > every six months. The concept of "Fedora 33 release" or "Fedora 34 > > release" is a strong concept with all these sort of institutional > > ripples. > > > > And why cannot we make this evolve ? Is it bad to have a Fedora that has > streams instead of versions ? We can. Can I ask that you please read my *whole* emails before writing your replies? Or at least if you must reply in-line while reading, please after you finish, go back and see if what you wrote earlier still applies? All of this stuff up top is irrelevant because it's all based on an assumption that I was saying FCOS must at all costs align with existing processes and schedules, when I was not saying that at all. I was just trying to outline the situation and the factors that need to be considered. I'll reply to the stuff from lower down, where you actually engaged with what I was actually saying, in a separate mail. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha https://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
