On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 11:52:09AM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > On Thu, 2020-10-29 at 13:12 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > > This might be a good time to start discussing the possibility of > > having > > "organization" ACLs (e.g. if a bunch of employees at FB, or Datto, or > > another company -- or, say, an Apache project want to collectively > > maintain packages). > > > > Are you proposing "pkgdb" group such as: > > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/group/view/ruby-packagers-sig > > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/group/view/nodejs-sig > > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/group/view/virtmaint-sig > > > Yes, precisely. Just with a slightly different scope. > > > > But groups can't be the "main admin" of a package. > > > That part is fine, the pkgdb group is sufficient to make sure a > consistent set of maintainers have access to the packages. > > If there's no philosophical objection I can open an infra ticket and > see where it goes. If you open a ticket, this may be an useful read prior to doing so: https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/howtos/blob/master/f/groups_in_fedora.md?text=True (It'll help providing all the infos needed in the ticket). Pierre _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
