On Thu, 2020-10-29 at 13:12 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > This might be a good time to start discussing the possibility of > having > "organization" ACLs (e.g. if a bunch of employees at FB, or Datto, or > another company -- or, say, an Apache project want to collectively > maintain packages). > > Are you proposing "pkgdb" group such as: > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/group/view/ruby-packagers-sig > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/group/view/nodejs-sig > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/group/view/virtmaint-sig > Yes, precisely. Just with a slightly different scope. > > But groups can't be the "main admin" of a package. > That part is fine, the pkgdb group is sufficient to make sure a consistent set of maintainers have access to the packages. If there's no philosophical objection I can open an infra ticket and see where it goes. Best regards, -- Michel Alexandre Salim profile: https://keyoxide.org/michel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx chat via email: https://delta.chat/ GPG key: 5DCE 2E7E 9C3B 1CFF D335 C1D7 8B22 9D2F 7CCC 04F2
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
