On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 8:11 AM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 16. 09. 20 2:20, Neal Gompa wrote: > > Something that Mageia and openSUSE do sometimes is just not ship a > > -devel package if the library is only there for runtime backwards > > compatibility. That's something we could do for openssl1.0 and > > eventually openssl1.1. > > IIRC Tomas attempted to do this twice with openssl1.0 but it broke many things > so he orphaned the package instead: Allegedly 3.0 should be API compatible with 1.1 so there should be less (no?) need for a devel package once everything is rebuilt, there was API changes from 1.0 -> 1.1 hence why 1.0 has hung around longer than planned/hoped. P _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
