Hi Fedora developers,
we need to introduce temporarily a compat package for OpenSSL as it is
going to be rebased to the 3.0 version in Rawhide once the 3.0 release
is stable.
The 3.0 version should not break API from the 1.1.1, it just breaks the
ABI, so rebuilds should be quite easy. Of course there might be minor
breakage and adjustments needed especially for the language bindings.
But anyway to help with the transition there should temporarily be a
compat package with the openssl-1.1.1.
I've submitted a new compat-openssl11 package for review but it was
pointed out to me that according to the new format of the naming for
compat packages it should be named openssl1.1. However there already is
a compat-openssl10 package.
What is more important? Consistency between those two compat packages
or strictly following the naming rules for the new package?
--
Tomáš Mráz
No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back.
Turkish proverb
[You'll know whether the road is wrong if you carefully listen to your
conscience.]
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
