On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 1:27 PM Tomas Mraz <tmraz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Fedora developers, > > we need to introduce temporarily a compat package for OpenSSL as it is > going to be rebased to the 3.0 version in Rawhide once the 3.0 release > is stable. > > The 3.0 version should not break API from the 1.1.1, it just breaks the > ABI, so rebuilds should be quite easy. Of course there might be minor > breakage and adjustments needed especially for the language bindings. > But anyway to help with the transition there should temporarily be a > compat package with the openssl-1.1.1. > > I've submitted a new compat-openssl11 package for review but it was > pointed out to me that according to the new format of the naming for > compat packages it should be named openssl1.1. However there already is > a compat-openssl10 package. > > What is more important? Consistency between those two compat packages > or strictly following the naming rules for the new package? > Please name it the new way. Otherwise we'll never finish switching over. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
