On 15. 09. 20 19:26, Tomas Mraz wrote:
What is more important? Consistency between those two compat packages or strictly following the naming rules for the new package?
Why not both? I.e. renaming compat-openssl10 to openssl1.0 while packaging openssl1.1?
Note that I've always considered the compat-openssl10 name quite confusing, so I would prefer the new one to be openssl1.1 (even if you don't rnemae the old one).
-- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
