On Tue, 2020-09-15 at 19:33 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 15. 09. 20 19:26, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> > What is more important? Consistency between those two compat
> > packages
> > or strictly following the naming rules for the new package?
>
> Why not both? I.e. renaming compat-openssl10 to openssl1.0 while
> packaging
> openssl1.1?
>
> Note that I've always considered the compat-openssl10 name quite
> confusing, so I
> would prefer the new one to be openssl1.1 (even if you don't rnemae
> the old one).
I do not think it is worth it to rename the old one and I am not even
maintainer of it in Fedora anymore. It should be dropped ASAP as it is
release without upstream support.
So OK, I'll use openssl1.1 for the new one.
--
Tomáš Mráz
No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back.
Turkish proverb
[You'll know whether the road is wrong if you carefully listen to your
conscience.]
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
