Re: compat-openssl11 vs openssl1.1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 1:36 PM Nathanael D. Noblet <nathanael@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2020-09-15 at 19:26 +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> > I've submitted a new compat-openssl11 package for review but it was
> > pointed out to me that according to the new format of the naming for
> > compat packages it should be named openssl1.1. However there already
> > is
> > a compat-openssl10 package.
> >
> > What is more important? Consistency between those two compat packages
> > or strictly following the naming rules for the new package?
> >
>
> My 2 cents would be consistency. If others disagree, perhaps compat-
> openssl10 should be renamed to compat-openssl1.0 and obsolete the old
> compat-openssl10? Its annoying to try to find the magic name something
> has based on something else... python-foo vs Foo-python etc.

The compat- prefix is no longer allowed. Instead we should be using
versioned package names.

So if we're changing the old one, it'll become openssl1.0 to comply
with current guidelines.


-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux