Re: The Future of the Java Stack (also regarding ELN and RHEL)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



What Fabio just mentioned was that the current use case for a
build-time only package is invalid. A lot of packages Mikolaj is
trying to get build-time only (via modules) are still maintained by
the Java Maintenance SIG because they're required by other packages.

Allowing them to be build-time only results in the entire ecosystem
crumbling. If they're retired, the ecosystem crumbles too. Same result
either way.


That's why the Java Maintenance SIG was built: so that it can be more
than one person working on these packages.


- Alex

On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 12:44 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
<zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 06:01:11PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 5:52 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 11:03:39AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > > > An other more generic approach which has been brought up once or
> > > > twice, but which not really has been discussed in much detail yet
> > > > I believe is creating a fedora-builddep repository.
> > > >
> > > > ATM a normal user has 3 ursine Fedora repos installed:
> > > >
> > > > fedora
> > > > fedora-updates
> > > > fedora-updates-testing (disabled by default)
> > > >
> > > > What if we add a 4th repo called fedora-builddep:
> > > >
> > > > fedora
> > > > fedora-updates
> > > > fedora-updates-testing (disabled by default)
> > > > fedora-builddep (rolling (within a release), disabled by default)
> > > >
> > > > So the idea is that all the maven deps which you need, but
> > > > do not want to offer any end-user support on would go to
> > > > fedora-builddep.
> > >
> > > If we absolutely must have build-only packages, we can do it more simply:
> > > insert
> > >   Requires: fedora-unmaintained-package
> > > or
> > >   Requires: fedora-buildonly-package
> > > (name TBD), and beef up dnf a bit to explain that "this package cannot
> > > be installed because it's only maintained at the level appropriate for
> > > building packages...". I think there are two advantages: first, no need
> > > for a separate repo, so there'll be less infra change and churn. Second,
> > > this tag can easily set on each subrpm, without any central list to manage.
> >
> > I'm not sure making things available only at build-time is going to
> > help things. It's just "Modularity under a different name" ...
> > Most Java packages are either directly or indirectly depended on by
> > non-build-tool packages as well.
> > You'd be surprised. Most of the distro directly or indirectly depends
> > on the Java stack already - including the libvirt stack, libreoffice,
> > some GNOME components, KDE components, etc. So most of those Java
> > packages can't be built-time-only packages because they're actually
> > required at runtime.
> > The number of packages that are *really only ever needed to build
> > other RPM packages and for no other reasons* is rather small.
>
> You are probably right. Still, this would be useful to actually have this
> surfaced. If a package marked build-time-only would be needed by anything
> else, we would need to either unmark it (and have somebody on the hook
> for maintaince) or drop the dependency somehow. And this would be vastly
> better than build-time-only packages in modules.
>
> I'm not enthusiastic about build-time-only packages, but if the choice
> is between that and retiring the packages (or hiding them in modules
> which has the same effect), I'll take it.
>
> Zbyszek
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux