Re: The Future of the Java Stack (also regarding ELN and RHEL)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2020-09-10 at 22:19 +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> > 
> > So conceptually, one way we can solve this problem by implementing a way
> > to mark certain non-modular RPMs as "build root only" packages and thus
> > composing them into a separate "build root" yum repo, that is not enabled
> > by default except in the build system.
> 
> Yes. This can also be achieved with on-demand side tags that are
> already implemented: "build-only" packages are built in a sidetag and
> untagged before sidetag is merged. They never appear in release tags
> and they are not shipped to users. Builds can be reproduced locally in
> mock with configs generated by "koji mock-config" command.

I have to say I agree with Neal that for Fedora this is an anti-feature
and should not be done.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux