On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 5:30 AM Remi Collet <Fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Le 09/07/2020 à 20:00, Ben Cotton a écrit : > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ModularPolicy > > > There is a preview of the new policy available at > > https://sgallagh.fedorapeople.org/docs/modularity/modularity/policies/ > > > I think this part may be confusing > > Packages provided at runtime by the default stream of a module MUST > depend only on packages provided by packages from default module > streams or the non-modular package set. By extension, default streams > of a module MUST NOT have a dependency on any non-default stream.[3] > > I think if should be possible, and modularity have been designed for > such usage, to depend on "all" versions of a dependant stream > > Example, > > LANG as a module with version 1, 2, 3 > > APP using LANG build using each version > > So in metadata > > data > name: APP > dependencies: > - buildrequires: > LANG: [] > - requires > LANG: [] > > And documentation seems to forbid this usage. > You are correct, this was an oversight. Would this improve the phrasing? ``` Packages provided at runtime by the default stream of a module MUST depend only on packages provided by packages from default module streams or the non-modular package set. By extension, default streams of a module that have modular dependencies MUST be satisfied by the default streams of those dependencies. ``` _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
