Re: Policy for Modules in Fedora and Fedora ELN - Fedora 33 Self-Contained Change proposal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Just FTR, I don't think I am going to reveal too much saying that for
RHEL9, the sentiment is (at least in the context of Ruby, Node.js and
Python) that we are very likely not going to use default streams. Plain
old RPMs do mostly the same job.

In this context, I'd be more than happy if the documentation discouraged
use of the default streams. Something along these lines: "Modularity
have default stream feature, but use it with caution only if you know
what you do and what is the impact."


Vít


Dne 09. 07. 20 v 20:00 Ben Cotton napsal(a):
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ModularPolicy
>
> == Summary ==
> Establish a set of rules for Modular content in Fedora to ensure an
> optimal user and packager experience.
>
> == Owner ==
> * Name: [[User:Sgallagh| Stephen Gallagher]]
> * Email: sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> == Detailed Description ==
> Over the last several months, members of the Modularity WG and FESCo
> have been working to establish a policy for module inclusion in
> Fedora. We now have a proposal that FESCo requested be taken to the
> Fedora community via the Change Proposal.
>
> There is a preview of the new policy available at
> https://sgallagh.fedorapeople.org/docs/modularity/modularity/policies/
>
>
> == Benefit to Fedora ==
> This policy makes explicit what packagers can and cannot do with
> Modules in Fedora, which should avoid future issues like those that
> were seen during the Fedora 31 and Fedora 32 cycles.
>
> == Scope ==
> * Proposal owners:
> The proposal is written, so minimal work remains. We may need to make
> revisions or clarifications based on public feedback.
>
> * Other developers: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
> * Release engineering: N/A
> N/A (not a System Wide Change)
>
> == How To Test ==
> N/A (not a System Wide Change)
>
> == User Experience ==
> N/A this is not a user-facing change.
>
> == Dependencies ==
> N/A (not a System Wide Change)
>
> == Contingency Plan ==
> * Contingency mechanism: (What to do?  Who will do it?) N/A (not a
> System Wide Change)
> * Contingency deadline: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
> * Blocks release? N/A (not a System Wide Change)
>
> == Documentation ==
> N/A (not a System Wide Change)
>
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux