On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 12:49 AM John M. Harris Jr <johnmh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thursday, July 2, 2020 3:47:00 PM MST Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 12:22 AM John M. Harris Jr <johnmh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > That's a link to the release announcement. If you follow the thread, > > > you'll find that I was provided a link to two bugzilla links are to meta > > > links to blockers, where the items that are blocking are not issues > > > preventing x86 systems from actually functioning. Source: My 5 remaining, > > > functional, F30 x86 systems. > > > > > > I had told you then what went wrong with the i686 SIG and since you > > had asked for open issues to work on in your free time, I gave you the > > links to the two trackers. I guess you haven't found the time to > > spare. > > None of the linked blockers are core packages, and some of them are outright > not designed to work on anything other than 64 bit. I really don't understand > how you can see that as justification. Even though both trackers still receive reports, many packagers just stopped bothering with i686, because there was little response and there were long-lasting breakages in rawhide. A distro arch is more than the kernel; what good is having a 32-bit kernel and nothing to run on it? See how many i686 bugs are closed as WONTFIX or INSUFFICIENT_DATA. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
