Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Make btrfs the default file system for desktop variants

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2020-07-02 at 21:37 +0300, Konstantin Kharlamov wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-07-02 at 09:44 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > * Konstantin Kharlamov:
> > 
> > > FWIW, I was just thinking about it, and I came up with example you
> > > may like which shows exactly why BTRFS is bad for HDD. Consider
> > > development process. It includes rewriting source files over and
> > > over: you do `git checkout foo` and files are overwritten, you
> > > change a file in text editor, and it gets overwritten. And since
> > > BTRFS is CoW, it will always write files to a new place.
> > 
> > Editors that make a backup copy typically do not overwrite files in
> > place.  They rename the file to the backup location and then write the
> > new file.
> > 
> > git checkout unlinks changed files first, before writing them anew
> > from scratch.
> > 
> > A COW file system does not make a difference for these use cases
> > because there is already COW at the application level.
> > 
> > The GNU assembler truncates the output object file first.  On XFS,
> > that triggers relocation to a new file system location as well, even
> > if the output file size (or contents) does not change.  So that
> > scenario is essentially COW as well today.
> 
> Per my understanding what happens when you write a new file and delete an old
> one is that a block that old file was taking gets freed.
> 
> Then, if you copy the file again, file system should find a free block to
> write this copy into. And this block likely would be the one that got freed
> previously.
> 
> So, well, it is indeed COW, but not the one BTRFS does. It's a COW that copies
> a file back and forth between two blocks :) This is kinda HDD-friendly COW :)
> 
> BTRFS on the other hand will not rewrite older block unless it's out of new
> ones.

Just to clarify: I do not claim this is how ext4 or xfs works. This simplistic
explanation is just something obvious regarding how a non-COW fs would work, but
of course there can be reasons for them to behave differently. If someone knows
better, they're welcome. What I do know though, is how a COW FS works, because I
did work a little with ZFS at dayjob.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux