Re: The future of legacy BIOS support in Fedora.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday, July 2, 2020 3:09:14 PM MST Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 10:54 PM John M. Harris Jr <johnmh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thursday, July 2, 2020 8:24:49 AM MST Gordon Messmer wrote:
> > 
> > > On 7/2/20 3:16 AM, nickysn@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Note that, even though Microsoft is pushing for UEFI on new systems
> > > > in
> > > > the OEM version of Windows, they still support booting in legacy BIOS
> > > > mode in the latest Windows 10 version and they even support a 32-bit
> > > > version of Windows 10, which Fedora no longer does
> > > > ...
> > > > I'm by no means a Microsoft fan, but these are facts. Fedora is
> > > > pushing
> > > > for hardware obsolescence faster than Microsoft in this regard.:(
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I think that as far as 32-bit support is concerned, the issue was less
> > > that Fedora pushed for "hardware obsolescence" and more that no one
> > > "pushed" for support.  Fedora is a collection of the work of
> > > volunteers,
> > > and supporting 32-bit hardware requires more than simply sending SRPMs
> > > through the build pipeline.  Things break, and over time there were
> > > fewer volunteers willing and able to fix those problems.  The way I
> > > remember it, there were plenty of statements to the effect that as long
> > > as someone was willing to do that work, Fedora would continue to
> > > publish
> > > a 32-bit release.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > That doesn't strictly apply to discussions about dropping BIOS boot
> > > support, but that doesn't look like it will happen any time soon.
> >
> >
> >
> > That's not really true. When it came down to it, it was dropped while 32
> > bit Fedora still worked perfectly. I'm left with 5 systems that will
> > never be updated as a result. I asked for a list of issues that warranted
> > ending 32 bit support while it still worked, and got nothing.
> 
> 
> That's certainly not true:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> thread/MVOBCE4G7DKZ56CQXF3B53WXF7LXHYXJ/

That's a link to the release announcement. If you follow the thread, you'll 
find that I was provided a link to two bugzilla links are to meta links to 
blockers, where the items that are blocking are not issues preventing x86 
systems from actually functioning. Source: My 5 remaining, functional, F30 x86 
systems.

-- 
John M. Harris, Jr.

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux