On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 4:00 PM Jiri Vanek <jvanek@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 7/1/20 3:21 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 3:09 PM Aleksandar Kurtakov <akurtako@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> Fabio, does it mean that the Java SIG agrees with progressing with the Change to Java 11 as a default? > > > > Speaking for myself, yes. > > > > I can't speak for all other SIG members (we haven't formally voted on > > this or something like that), but from conversations we've had I > > gather that all active package maintainers are looking forward to > > finally getting Java 11 by default. > > Yes, despite many soon FTBFS and thus soon orphaned pkgs, It looks taht active people wish to > proceed with change, rather then doing the possibly clumsy step back. > > I'm progressing toward the mass rebuild in side tag. > > I'm aware about three packages needing commits to change - java-11-openjdk, java-1.8.0-openjdk and > javapackages-tools. > > Fabio, saying "you have not got xmvn change", Is tere something I need to check for? I was wondering whether you had included javapackages-tools in the COPR with the second commit from the PR: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/javapackages-tools/pull-request/3#commit_list Fabio _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
