On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 3:32 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 03:36:30PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 1:27 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On 18. 06. 20 21:22, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > > The introduction > > > > of default module streams was a direct result of wanting to help > > > > customers that are used to running 'yum install mariadb' still be able > > > > to do that. > > > > > > Hello Josh. > > > > > > I'd like to ask whether RHEL 9 has decided for default modular streams despite > > > their failure in Fedora, whether this decision is final and what was the > > > reasoning behind it. > > Hi Josh, Miro, > > I think there has been a misunderstanding. I'm pretty sure Miro's > question is about "default modules" not "default streams" > (i.e. "modules enabled by default" vs. "the stream of a module to use > when a different one is not explicitly selected"). > Default streams are not subject of much discussion. There is no plan > to limit them either in Fedora or ELN. But from your reply it is not > clear which of those you have in mind. Let's please clarify what we're > talking about first... Could you clarify more then? What is a "default module"? One that is in the non-modular buildroot? josh _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
