James Cassell wrote:
> If you're doing this, might I suggest reversing the condition so the new
> way is in the "else" part, hence "default"?
The problem is that this results in a counterintuitive &&, as in:
%if 0%{?fedora} <= 32 && 0%{?rhel} <= 8
(by de Morgan's law, or if you want to analyze it directly, because
0%{?rhel} <= 8 will always be true on Fedora).
> I've run into issues rebuilding packages because there was such a
> condition from a decade ago and I didn't have %fedora defined because I
> was trying to build it for another distro. (Common issue amongst the ruby
> packages.)
Then you will always get the conditional for the oldest Fedora (no matter
what is the %if and what the %else part) because 0%{?fedora} will be 0, by
design.
The specfiles in Fedora dist-git are either only for Fedora or for Fedora
and RHEL/CentOS. They are not expected to work on any other distro.
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
