Re: The Git forge decision (was CPE Weekly: 2020-03-28)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



----- Original Message -----
> From: "Martin Kolman" <mkolman@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Leigh Griffin" <lgriffin@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2020 3:05:54 PM
> Subject: Re: The Git forge decision (was CPE Weekly: 2020-03-28)


> > And to be clear: there's a difference between a Fedora-sponsored
> > Development forge and a new git forge for dist-git. A lot of this
> > discussion has conflated these two cases. I mostly care about it
> > releasing the former role (pagure.io) and don't care much about
> > the latter role (s.fp.o).
> I personally see this pretty much the other way - there are many good
> or usable forges for hosting ones project. There is at the moment pretty much
> only one git forge with good (and any at all any) integration with Fedora
> processes
> - Pagure.
> 
> That's why I see Pagure as important mostly in the Fedora family context and
> less
> important in the general git forge are. It would certainly be nice to see
> Pagure
> take over that as well, but I see having a fully open git forge with full
> Fedora integration sitting on top of distgit as more important.

I don't really use dist-git's forge for much. Maybe for hitting "fork" when
I need to open a PR against another repo, and filing the PR. Everything else
happens via fedpkg/git/bodhi/koji... on the command line. 

I don't really care about showing the latest versions of packages on dist-git
(that's what bodhi/koji is for). That's the most recent user-visible feature,
yes? Why that? ~shrugs~

Having a little better admin/group integration would be nice.

But as long as it doesn't take ages to fork a repo (and Pagure does sometimes!),
I don't really care. I'm also not a proven packager or the owner of a huge
package dependency tree (python, java, perl, ...). I really just care about a
few packages, plus whatever is in the Stewardship SIG.

I guess a little nicer orphan/unorphan package procedure would be nice, but
you'd still need a ticket for unretiring dead packages, which is where I've hit
the most problems/delays.

But as long as I can continue to work from the command line, I don't really
care what the WebUI is as long as it works and isn't too slow.



My 2c. but I'm really agnostic about dist-git forges. :-)

- Alex
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux