On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 7:02 AM Leigh Griffin <lgriffin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> I was really looking forward to reading what >> Neal (as he's doing now) and others had to say about the requirements >> *before* any decision was taken, and how each tool covers them or not, >> and what kind of effort would require to cover it in the latter case. >> This is *very* disappointing. > > I'm sorry this is disappointing but even reading the analysis by Neal it is looking at the merit of the requirement and not looking at the fact that it is valuable to somebody. Each stakeholder group had their own means to discuss and debate the merits and had them rolled into CPE who in turn analysed them and published the full story list. I'm not bothering with the other aspects because there's no point. You *already* decided. Why should I evaluate the merits of the requirements when you've already decided they mattered enough to use them for deciding for GitLab? -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
