On 3/30/20 2:33 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 01:57:22PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:On 30. 03. 20 13:52, Petr Pisar wrote:If I undeestand the proposal correctly there there will be an ELN branch or a name space. But not by default. Only for those packages that reject the change in Fedora.I wonder where is this coming from, because that's exactly what we want and exactly what the change owners don't want.That's my impression from Alexandra's replies. I think she wrote that packages that must significantly differ from Fedora will have an ELN override. So I conclude their sources must be somewhere stored. And since Koji does not allow building from a non-dist-git, It must be in the dist-git.
The way I understood it, the "ELN override" Alexandra described was using `%if %rhel` (or sometimes `%if %eln`) conditionals directly on the master branch.
Tomas
I frankly cannot see how the create-a-pull-request-and-wait-for-the-merge procedure would scale if the ELN maintainer would need to adjust more than a few packages. The easiest way would be probably allow building ELN from pull-requests. But the maintainability would be terrible. -- Petr
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
