On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 11:10:17AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > It is kind of irony, that the ELN branch idea is still rejected. > Therefore there will be PRs coming from Stephen's and Alexandra's (or > anybody else in ELN SIG) forks of packages, containing changes needed to > build some packages in ELN, which nobody is going to merge. In the > meantime, the ELN builds will keep failing. > > I wonder why there can't be PR's coming from ELN branch. That would > > 1) Allow the ELN builds to pass. > If I undeestand the proposal correctly there there will be an ELN branch or a name space. But not by default. Only for those packages that reject the change in Fedora. I'm more curious what will happen with the ELN branch once the change is merged into Fedora's master. Will the ELN branch be removed? Will the ELN branch be reset to Fedora's master indefinetely and automatically? Or will be stalled and once ELN maintainer needs a new change he will do tricks with three-side git merge? I'm asking because I would prefer the first approach and because I know the second one is forbidden in Fedora's dist-git. -- Petr
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
