On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 01:57:22PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 30. 03. 20 13:52, Petr Pisar wrote: > > If I undeestand the proposal correctly there there will be an ELN branch or > > a name space. But not by default. Only for those packages that reject the > > change in Fedora. > > I wonder where is this coming from, because that's exactly what we want and > exactly what the change owners don't want. > That's my impression from Alexandra's replies. I think she wrote that packages that must significantly differ from Fedora will have an ELN override. So I conclude their sources must be somewhere stored. And since Koji does not allow building from a non-dist-git, It must be in the dist-git. I frankly cannot see how the create-a-pull-request-and-wait-for-the-merge procedure would scale if the ELN maintainer would need to adjust more than a few packages. The easiest way would be probably allow building ELN from pull-requests. But the maintainability would be terrible. -- Petr
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
