On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 03:54:07PM +0100, Petr Viktorin wrote: > On 2020-03-25 17:33, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote: > > [Branching] removes community maintainer from the conversation about what > > downstream is doing. While we want to give community member a voice in > > that conversation. > > I fear that this proposal *forces* the community member to participate in > the discussion. That is a very different thing than giving them a voice. > That reminds me that even if all the ELN changes were pushed into dedicated branch, the package owner would have to grant commit access to the packagers who is going to maintain the ELN branch. This how Pagure works. We has already observed this issue with EPEL branches where someone else wants to maintain an EPEL package in the EPEL branch but cannot because the package owner in Fedora does not respond to grant him the commit access to that package. -- Petr
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
