On 23. 12. 19 1:23, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
On Sunday, December 22, 2019 4:56:52 AM MST Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 22. 12. 19 12:01, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
On Sunday, December 22, 2019 3:11:51 AM MST Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
1 was rejected because there was no hope for a python3 port because of
lack of development.
This is exactly the scenario that makes no sense to deny. If the package
is still maintained, regardless of lack of changes to the software, why
simply throw out working software?
Because the maintainers of its dependencies won't maintain them just for a
decade old dead software. Please, stop spreading this FUD about FESCo
outright denying requests for Python 2 exceptions. In a half year old
thread about a package that was retired 4 months ago because it wasn't
installable - with coordination from the maintainer.
So long as Python2 remains installable, I don't see why you feel the need to
rip it out of the distro.
Because the maintainers of the Python 2 packages don't want to maintain them
past Python 2 EOL. That includes me.
This is not the first time I'm answering this question to you. You seem to ask
it again and again. May I suggest you write the answer down and look it up next
time you have the tendency to ask again? That should prevent us to do this over
and over again.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
